Key points
- SharonAI (SHAZ) is a small, risky AI data center stock. I bought 100 shares Thursday near the lows around $65 as a starter position.
- Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund maxed out at 19.9% of SHAZ, tied to a $1.6 billion Nvidia financing. His fund also holds about 20% in Anthropic directly, which regular investors cannot buy.
- Anthropic is reportedly eyeing a 1.4 gigawatt, $15 billion data center buildout in Australia. Nothing is confirmed and SharonAI has not been named as a partner.
- This one carries real risk. A short report in April accused the CEO of self-dealing at his last company and questioned SharonAI's biggest contract.
Quick one on a small, dumb-on-purpose buy. I picked up 100 shares of SharonAI (SHAZ) Thursday near the lows around $65. Think of it as a first date, not a marriage. Here's why, and there's a wild Anthropic angle you need to hear.
So why did I buy this?
SharonAI runs GPU data centers for AI companies, the kind of business people call a "neocloud," meaning you rent Nvidia racks instead of building your own. It just landed a six-year Nvidia deal, up to 40,000 GB300 GPUs in Australia, backed by a $1.6 billion raise. The stock has been a rocket and a mess this year, sometimes on the same day. Under a dollar last summer. Almost $100 in June. Around $65 to $68 now. That is the kind of chart that gives me a headache and also gets my attention.
Then there's Leopold, and it gets weird
Here's the real reason I looked at this one. Leopold Aschenbrenner runs a hedge fund called Situational Awareness, and it's reportedly up huge betting on AI. His firm built a stake in SHAZ right up to 19.9 percent, suspiciously close to the legal line where bigger disclosure rules kick in. I follow his filings on our fund tracker because when a guy this deep in AI makes a move, I want to know, not because I think I'm smarter than him.
People call SharonAI "the Anthropic play." Here's the actual story. SharonAI has no confirmed deal with Anthropic. Its real partner is Nvidia. The Anthropic tie runs through Leopold, not the company. About 20 percent of his fund sits directly in Anthropic, a stake reportedly worth billions, and he is also engaged to Avital Balwit, chief of staff to Anthropic's CEO. You and I cannot buy Anthropic. It is private. Riding along on Leopold's public bets, like SHAZ, is about as close as regular guys like us get.
Here's the part that got me curious, and it broke after I already owned the shares. We went deeper on this today. A leaked tender document reported by Australian media shows Anthropic wants 1.4 gigawatts of data center capacity in Australia, close to $15 billion, with about 1 gigawatt online by the end of 2027. Nothing is decided yet, a call is expected in about six weeks, and SharonAI already builds data centers there, so it is at least in the conversation. But Anthropic's confirmed compute partners are Microsoft Azure, Amazon, and Google, not SharonAI, at least not yet. This is a real "what if," the fun kind, not a reason to bet the rent.
The risks, because I'm not blind
This is a small, risky stock, and here's why. A short seller called Bleecker Street Research put out a report in April going hard after this company. SharonAI's biggest contract is worth $1.25 billion, with an Indian company called ESDS, paying around $250 million a year. ESDS itself only reported $39.9 million in revenue and $69.5 million in total assets last year. I am no accountant, but that math does not work.
The report also goes after CEO James Manning directly. His old company, Mawson Infrastructure, is suing him, claiming he moved $11.5 million through a shipping company he controlled without telling the board. That is an accusation, not a conviction, but it is not nothing either. The same report also flags part of SharonAI's $500 million debt facility as possibly not fully backed. None of this makes me feel good, and it is exactly why this stays small.
So where I land
I like the Nvidia deal. I like that a guy this deep in AI is willing to max out a stake here. The Anthropic tender is a fun story I am watching, not something I am trading on yet. I do not love the math on that anchor contract, or a CEO getting sued for moving money behind his own board's back. So I bought near the lows, treating it like a scratch-off ticket, not a stock I plan to marry. If it goes to zero, I will shrug and move on. If Anthropic shows up here, that is a bonus I never paid for. I am looking for a quick bounce, not a long-term hold.
This is not investment advice, obviously. I hold SHAZ and I am biased about my own bag. Do your own research before buying anything, especially a name with this much real, documented drama attached to it.
