Apple (AAPL) could keep selling iPhones and still lose services revenue to Meta's AI agent, analysts warn

Two phones, one showing the Apple logo and one showing Meta's Muse logo

Key points

  • Needham keeps its Hold on Apple
  • The worry is AI agents like Meta's
  • BofA sees the risk but keeps its Buy

Needham analyst Laura Martin kept a Hold rating on Apple (AAPL) on Thursday, warning that a rival's AI agent, paired with its own devices, could take over the iPhone's role as the main way people find services and make purchases.

Martin called that the biggest investment risk for Apple shareholders. In her scenario, Meta or another AI-first competitor builds an AI agent, the hardware to run it, and a way to make money from it. That would cut the iPhone out of the middle and undermine Apple's ecosystem.

Her note came two days after Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan flagged the same threat from Meta Platforms' (META) Muse agent, while keeping a Buy rating. Apple shares were down 0.8% at $330.48 near Thursday's close, and Meta was up 0.1% at $726.09.

Why does Needham see Meta as the threat?

Martin traces it back to 2021, when Apple launched App Tracking Transparency, a privacy feature that Meta has said cost it $10 billion in ad revenue over the following 12 months. Since then, she wrote, Meta's "primary goal has been to replace Apple's consumer platform with its own."

Martin said Meta is developing products that directly attack Apple's core business. Needham projects Meta's revenue at $263 billion in 2026, about half of Apple's, and believes Meta wants to close that gap.

The product at the center of both notes is Muse, the personal AI agent Meta launched in September. It can browse the web, fill out forms, book trips, and make purchases for its users. It's also been one of the fastest-growing apps in the US.

What did Bank of America say?

Mohan kept his Buy rating and $370 price target on Apple in a September 29 note.

"The risk for Apple is that it can keep every handset sale and still lose discovery, referral, and transaction initiation," Mohan wrote. He said Siri doesn't have persistent background tasks, broad support for actions in third-party apps, or dedicated payment infrastructure for agents.

"Whomever the agent chooses becomes the merchant, and whoever owns the agent collects the routing economics that previously accrued to operating systems, search, and app stores," he wrote.

Frequently asked questions

What did Needham say about Apple and Meta?

On October 1, 2026, Needham analyst Laura Martin kept a Hold rating on Apple (AAPL) and said the biggest investment risk for Apple shareholders is that Meta (META) or another AI-first competitor builds an AI agent, hardware, and monetization stack that disintermediates the iPhone.

Why does Needham think Meta wants to replace Apple's platform?

Martin traced it to Apple's 2021 App Tracking Transparency feature, which Meta has said cost it $10 billion in ad revenue over the following 12 months. Needham projects Meta's 2026 revenue at $263 billion, about half of Apple's.

What did Bank of America say about Meta's Muse and Apple?

On September 29, 2026, Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan kept a Buy rating and $370 price target on Apple but warned that Apple could keep every handset sale and still lose discovery, referral, and transaction initiation to AI agents like Meta's Muse.

How did Apple stock react to the Needham note?

Apple shares were down 0.8% at $330.48 near the close on October 1, 2026, while Meta shares were up 0.1% at $726.09.

More on AAPL and META

Dennis Singleton
Dennis Singleton

Dennis Singleton was born in Australia and later moved to the United States. He has spent years following the markets, but what keeps his attention is how AI is built. He writes about the companies behind the technology, from semiconductor designers and advanced packaging to photonics, memory, networking, and the hardware powering modern AI. His approach starts with filings, earnings, and industry research, then translates the important details into clear, straightforward analysis without unnecessary hype.