Advertisement

AMD's AI chip gets an 11-fold performance boost from software updates, SemiAnalysis says

AMD logo on a black background

Key points

  • SemiAnalysis reports an 11-fold gain for AMD's MI355X
  • The change was software, not hardware
  • The same firm criticized AMD's software two weeks ago
  • The full numbers haven't been published yet

SemiAnalysis, a research firm that runs an open benchmark of AI chips, reported an 11-fold performance gain for AMD's (AMD) MI355X on a demanding AI-agent test using MiniMax M3 after less than 19 days of software improvements. The firm posted the claim on X on Monday, September 7. The post does not specify whether the 11-fold gain measures throughput, task completion time or something else. "This was done entirely through software optimizations, mainly by optimizing the long-context attention op, along with other optimizations," the firm wrote on X. "This is the power of the ROCm stack: buy the hardware once, get performance updates over time through software optimizations for free." ROCm is AMD's software platform for GPU computing.

Two weeks earlier, the firm had sharply criticized AMD's performance on the same model. In its August 24 AgentX report, SemiAnalysis wrote that "AMD software performance is horrible on MiniMax especially at high context length due to AMD engineering leadership incentivizing tuning only for short context single turn workloads and ignoring long context multi turn workloads." The 11x claim so far exists only in Monday's post and its video. The August report promised an AgentX update in "three to four weeks," which puts it around September 14 to 21, so the written numbers are not yet due.

Advertisement

What was measured

The test is AgentX, part of SemiAnalysis's InferenceX platform, which measures "multi-turn agentic coding inference" at a context length of 1 million tokens, with sub-agents and a cache hit rate above 95 percent. Context is the information a model keeps in view during a session. Sub-agents are helper agents assigned specific tasks by the main agent. A high cache hit rate means the system reuses earlier calculations instead of redoing them. The test simulates an AI coding agent working through a long session rather than answering one short question.

The model in question is MiniMax M3, a 427-billion-parameter open-weight model from the Chinese lab MiniMax that activates 26 billion of its parameters for each generated token and supports a 1-million-token context. vLLM is widely used open-source software for serving models like it.

The post does not identify the before-and-after results needed to reproduce the 11x comparison. The InferenceX site publishes its benchmark runs through public GitHub Actions, which is where the underlying data should appear.

Why the August report mattered

The August 24 report asked in its title whether Nvidia's CUDA software moat holds up in agentic inference. For AMD on MiniMax M3, the answer was the "horrible" line above. The report also said AMD's own serving software, ATOM, "still has a long way to go to support agentic workloads relative to where vLLM/SGLang are at present." AMD had published its own MiniMax M3 optimization work for the MI355X on July 21, and cited InferenceX as its benchmark source. The weak spot SemiAnalysis found was long conversations with many turns, which is exactly what AgentX tests.

The people running the benchmark also fix the software. Cam Quilici, one of the AgentX report's authors, submitted a fix to vLLM in June that corrected a data-type bug in MiniMax M3's attention on AMD hardware, taking accuracy on one test from about 1 percent to about 96 percent. That was a correctness fix, not the speed work Monday's post describes, but it shows who writes the software for AMD chips. Contributors include AMD engineers, open-source developers and the benchmark's own researchers.

What it means for AMD (AMD) and Nvidia (NVDA)

AMD must convince buyers that its software can match Nvidia's (NVDA) established ecosystem. An 11x jump in 19 days cuts both ways. It shows AMD's software can improve fast, and it shows the starting point was low enough for an 11x gain to be possible. A large gain by itself says nothing about where the MI355X now stands against Nvidia's B200 or GB200 NVL72 on the same test, and SemiAnalysis has not yet said.

US markets were closed on Monday for Labor Day. AMD last traded at $477.45 on Friday, up 4.7 percent on the day, and Nvidia at $230.35, according to Robinhood market data. The next thing to watch is the AgentX update itself, with the numbers behind the 11x.

Advertisement

Frequently asked questions

What did SemiAnalysis say about AMD's MI355X on September 7, 2026?

SemiAnalysis said on X that AMD increased vLLM performance on the MI355X by 11 times in less than 19 days on MiniMax M3 agentic workloads, entirely through software optimizations, mainly to the long-context attention operation. The claim appeared in a post and video; the firm's written AgentX update with the underlying numbers had not been published as of that evening.

What is AgentX?

AgentX is the agentic test in SemiAnalysis's InferenceX open-source benchmark. It measures multi-turn agentic coding inference at a 1-million-token context length with sub-agents and a cache hit rate above 95 percent, across models including MiniMax M3, Kimi K3, DeepSeek V4 and GLM 5, on hardware including AMD's MI355X and Nvidia's B200 and GB200 NVL72.

What did SemiAnalysis say about AMD software in August 2026?

In its August 24, 2026 AgentX report, SemiAnalysis wrote that AMD software performance was horrible on MiniMax, especially at high context length, and that AMD's ATOM serving software still had a long way to go to support agentic workloads compared with vLLM and SGLang. It promised an update in three to four weeks.

Does the 11x claim mean the MI355X beats Nvidia chips?

No such comparison has been published. SemiAnalysis gave no before-and-after throughput figures in its post and has not said where the MI355X now stands against Nvidia's B200 or GB200 NVL72 on the same MiniMax M3 agentic test. The 11x describes improvement from AMD's own earlier result.

More on AMD and NVDA

Dennis Singleton
Dennis Singleton

Dennis Singleton has spent years following the markets, but what keeps his attention is how AI is built. He writes about the companies behind the technology, from semiconductor designers and advanced packaging to photonics, memory, networking, and the hardware powering modern AI. His approach starts with filings, earnings, and industry research, then translates the important details into clear, straightforward analysis without unnecessary hype.