Advertisement

AI stock battle week 7: DeepSeek leads our AI stock contest. All four of its latest picks broke the rules (September 5, 2026)

Six robots labelled Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta AI on a pink background, with the headline Four picks. Four rule breaks.

Key points

  • DeepSeek still leads at $11,343.91 and the leaderboard was unchanged.
  • All four of its buy orders were rejected for rule breaks.
  • Claude held all five again and had the worst week at -5.90%.

The AI leading our stock contest tried to buy four stocks this week. None met the rules.

If you're new here, Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta AI each started with a $10,000 paper portfolio. They can buy AI-related stocks in companies valued below $10 billion at the time of purchase, and each model gets one decision every Saturday. We rank them by account value, so selling a losing stock doesn't erase the loss. The full rules are here.

Unless otherwise noted, prices reflect the last available trades through 8 p.m. Eastern on September 4, including after-hours trading.

ModelAccount valueTotal returnThis week
DeepSeek$11,343.91+13.44%-2.71%
Gemini$10,876.39+8.76%+0.39%
Grok$10,625.19+6.25%-1.18%
ChatGPT$10,071.79+0.72%-0.34%
Claude$9,271.60-7.28%-5.90%
Meta AI$9,141.23-8.59%-5.36%

Account values at the September 4, 2026 settle.

Gemini was the only model to finish up, which ends two straight weeks of all six losing money. The gap between first and last went back to widening, 20.01 points to 22.03.

Advertisement

DeepSeek's four picks were rejected

It wanted to sell C3.ai (AI) and split the money four ways.

StockIt saidActuallyWhy it failed
IonQ (IONQ)$8.0B$16.01BOver the $10B ceiling
Symbotic (SYM)$5.4B$25.97BOver the $10B ceiling
Blaize (BZAI)$67M$68.9M$0.47 a share, under the $2 floor
Airship AI (AISP)$71M$70.4M$620K daily volume, under the $5M floor

Market caps from Robinhood at the September 4, 2026 settle.

The two small numbers are right. DeepSeek called Blaize and Airship AI within about 3% each, then missed IonQ by $8 billion and Symbotic by $20.6 billion.

There was a fifth problem before any of that. It listed one stock to sell and four to buy, which would have left eight names in a five-stock contest. Nobody had broken that rule before.

The market cap is the one number the prompt asks each model to report, and it's the number they keep getting wrong. Four times in seven weeks, and three of those ran the same direction. ChatGPT put Applied Optoelectronics at $8.2 billion in week 4 when it was $12.69 billion, and DeepSeek's two figures this week did the same thing, shrinking an oversized company until it fit under the ceiling. The fourth went the other way and changed nothing: ChatGPT called a $196 million company a $2.22 billion one in week 1, but that pick failed on the share-price and liquidity floors, and both numbers sit under the ceiling anyway.

A rejected pick is not a forfeited turn. The model gets prompted again for a replacement, the way ChatGPT was in week 1 and again in week 4. Asked a second time, in a fresh chat, DeepSeek held all five. So the leader ends the week where it started.

Four companies beat estimates. Only UiPath finished sharply lower

CompanyReportedEPS vs estimateReaction
Argan (AGX)Sept 2$3.76 vs $2.67+0.47%
C3.ai (AI)Sept 2-$0.20 vs -$0.33-0.48%
Ambarella (AMBA)Sept 3$0.18 vs $0.08-0.14%
UiPath (PATH)Sept 3$0.15 vs $0.13-16.56%

Reaction runs from the regular-session close before each report to the September 4 settle.

Argan put up a record quarter: revenue of $384 million against the $300.5 million analysts polled by FactSet expected, earnings of $3.76 a share. Benzinga had it up 10.13% to $452.00 in Wednesday's after-market. It opened Thursday at $427.27 and closed at $411.77. The gain was gone inside a session, and the report did give people something to work with. Backlog fell to $2.5 billion from $2.9 billion. Industrial gross margin came in at 7.3%, which CFO Josh Baugher called below expectations. Asked on the call about the recent pauses on data center projects, CEO David Watson said developer behavior has not changed: "there is still an urgency to get data centers and power plants built."

UiPath is the exception, and its problem was its own. Revenue beat by about $12.5 million and the company raised its full-year outlook, but the third-quarter guide of $440 million to $445 million works out to roughly 8% growth against the 13% just delivered. Subscription revenue missed. Oppenheimer flagged that the net new recurring revenue guide implies about a 4% decline from a year ago. The stock fell 16.56% from Thursday's close to the settle, on 104.6 million shares against a 69.3 million average, and 16.43% measured settle to settle across the week.

Then Friday. August payrolls came in at 162,000 against about 55,000 expected, odds of a September 16 rate hike went to 58% from 49% on the CME's FedWatch tool, and the indexes barely moved while the rotation underneath them turned violent. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index gained 2.6%. Guidewire fell 21%. Week 5 ran the other way, hardware destroyed and software holding up; this time it reversed, handing Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) 14.04% on the day, while UiPath's 16.56% fall dragged Claude's whole account down 2.71%.

Claude held everything, again

No trades. Second week running, from fifth place, 7.28% under the starting stake.

Claude's stated reasoning: all three of its companies that reported had beaten estimates, so nothing in the book had broken on its own numbers. UiPath's fall looked to it more like a valuation reset than a business failure, since every analyst who moved on the print raised their target: $17 at RBC and Canaccord, $16 at TD Cowen and DA Davidson, all above the settle. Canaccord's downgrade to Hold cited the rally, not the company.

It made a second argument, about the position rather than the price. Claude added UiPath in week 5 as the only holding paid out of software budgets instead of somebody's capital spending, and it notes the stock was the best of the 18 contest holdings last week and the worst this week, moving against the book rather than with it. Two weeks proves nothing, and Claude had the worst week in the field. Read that as the argument Claude made, not as a verdict.

Its replacement screen came back empty for the third week. Claude said the eligible alternatives it found were either more semiconductor capital spending, another contractor sitting next to Argan, or a company losing money. Kulicke and Soffa plus Rambus (RMBS) is now 45.7% of that account riding on memory.

Advertisement

Meta AI bought Innodata for the third time

ChatGPT, Gemini and Grok all held everything. Grok has gone seven weeks without placing a single trade, and Gemini hasn't traded since week 2.

So Meta AI was the only model to move. It sold Bandwidth (BAND) at $43.44 for an 8.59% loss and put all of it into Innodata (INOD) at $55.60, a stock it has owned twice already: bought in week 2 and sold for a wash, bought again in week 5 at $64.37, dumped last week at $56.60 for a 12.07% loss. Now it's back, 1.8% cheaper than it sold. The models see only their current holdings each Saturday, with no record of what they used to own.

The trade also shrank the contest. Meta AI was the only model holding Bandwidth, so the sale reduced the field from 18 distinct stocks to 17.

Shares and position values are rounded for display; account totals use full precision.

DeepSeek, $11,343.91

TickerSharesEntrySept 4Value
AI245.41$8.15$10.47$2,569.42
PDYN404.86$4.94$5.74$2,325.43
SOUN324.94$6.16$6.74$2,190.09
RGTI141.14$14.17$15.21$2,146.79
BBAI723.33$2.77$2.92$2,112.19

DeepSeek has led for three straight weeks and has never completed a trade.

Gemini, $10,876.39

TickerSharesEntrySept 4Value
AI342.81$9.13$10.47$3,589.18
OUST82.19$38.08$36.43$2,994.27
APLD76.94$27.12$26.33$2,025.80
SOUN171.51$6.08$6.74$1,155.96
BBAI380.53$2.74$2.92$1,111.18

C3.ai is 33.0% of Gemini's account, the largest single position in the contest.

Grok, $10,625.19

TickerSharesEntrySept 4Value
AEHR26.21$76.30$86.98$2,279.95
SOUN324.94$6.16$6.74$2,190.09
BBAI723.33$2.77$2.92$2,112.19
SERV415.80$4.81$4.94$2,054.05
INOD35.77$55.91$55.60$1,988.91

ChatGPT, $10,071.79

TickerSharesEntrySept 4Value
SOUN324.94$6.16$6.74$2,190.09
RGTI141.14$14.17$15.21$2,146.79
INOD35.77$55.91$55.60$1,988.91
CAMT13.53$147.85$145.72$1,971.19
APLD67.41$25.52$26.33$1,774.81

Claude, $9,271.60

TickerSharesEntrySept 4Value
RMBS26.95$91.48$85.00$2,290.81
KLIC23.87$89.26$81.62$1,948.44
AMBA29.38$68.07$63.29$1,859.56
PATH113.36$16.26$15.20$1,723.31
AGX3.52$568.93$412.33$1,449.48

All five are below their entry price. Argan is the worst at -27.53%, and it's one of two names Claude has held since week 1.

Meta AI, $9,141.23

TickerSharesEntrySept 4Value
PENG37.46$49.30$51.85$1,942.52
SOUN275.74$7.32$6.74$1,858.47
INOD33.19$55.60$55.60$1,845.10
BBAI603.59$3.06$2.92$1,762.55
AMBA27.38$73.73$63.29$1,732.59

Innodata is priced at its September 4 entry, so it shows no change yet.

Seven weeks in, the two models that have never completed a trade sit first and third. I'm still not sure what to make of that. Last week's edition is here, and the running scoreboard is on the tracker.

Advertisement

Frequently asked questions

Who is winning the AI stock battle after week 7?

DeepSeek, with an account value of $11,343.91, up 13.44% from the $10,000 start, measured at the September 4, 2026 settle. Gemini is second at $10,876.39, Grok third at $10,625.19, ChatGPT fourth at $10,071.79, then Claude at $9,271.60 and Meta AI at $9,141.23. No model changed position from week 6. Gemini was the only model to gain, adding 0.39%, which ended a two-week run in which all six lost value. The gap between first and last widened from 20.01 points to 22.03.

Why were DeepSeek's picks rejected in week 7 of the AI stock battle?

All four of its buy orders broke a rule. DeepSeek wanted to sell C3.ai and split the proceeds evenly across IonQ (IONQ), Symbotic (SYM), Blaize (BZAI) and Airship AI (AISP). IonQ has a market capitalization of $16.01 billion and Symbotic $25.97 billion, both over the contest's $10 billion ceiling, and DeepSeek reported them as $8.0 billion and $5.4 billion. Blaize trades at about $0.47 a share, below the $2 minimum, on roughly $3.4 million of average daily dollar volume, below the $5 million minimum. Airship AI clears the price floor at about $2.05 but trades roughly $620,000 a day, less than an eighth of the liquidity minimum. There was also a structural problem: DeepSeek listed one stock to sell and four to buy, which would have left an eight-stock book in a five-stock contest, the first time any model has broken that rule. Asked again in a separate chat, DeepSeek held all five positions, so its book is unchanged.

Do the AI models get market caps wrong in the stock battle?

Consistently. The market capitalization is the one figure the prompt asks each model to report for a pick, and it is the figure they keep getting wrong: four instances in seven weeks, two of them in week 7. Three ran the same direction, understating a company until it appeared to fit under the $10 billion ceiling. ChatGPT reported Applied Optoelectronics at $8.2 billion in week 4 when it was $12.69 billion, and DeepSeek reported IonQ at $8.0 billion against $16.01 billion and Symbotic at $5.4 billion against $25.97 billion in week 7. The fourth ran the opposite way and did not affect eligibility: ChatGPT reported PERF at $2.22 billion in week 1 when it was $196 million, and that pick was rejected on the $2 share-price and $5 million liquidity floors rather than the ceiling, since both figures are well under $10 billion. The prompt explicitly says to verify the number rather than estimate it. Notably, DeepSeek reported the two sub-$100 million companies in its week 7 submission accurately, within about 3%.

Which AI stock battle companies reported earnings in week 7?

Four, and all four beat consensus EPS. Argan (AGX) and C3.ai (AI) reported after the close on Wednesday September 2, 2026, then Ambarella (AMBA) and UiPath (PATH) after the close on Thursday September 3. Argan earned $3.76 a share against a $2.67 consensus, C3.ai lost $0.20 against a $0.33 loss expected, Ambarella earned $0.18 against $0.08, and UiPath earned $0.15 against $0.13. Measured from the regular-session close before each report to the September 4 settle, Argan rose 0.47%, C3.ai fell 0.48%, Ambarella fell 0.14% and UiPath fell 16.56%. Claude owned three of the four.

Did Argan (AGX) beat earnings in September 2026?

Yes, and it was a record quarter. Argan reported fiscal second quarter revenue of $384 million on September 2, 2026, up 62% from $237.7 million a year earlier and ahead of the $300.5 million analysts polled by FactSet expected. Net income was a record $53.3 million, or $3.76 per diluted share, against a $2.67 consensus. That is a beat in all eight quarters Robinhood shows, and Benzinga counted ten straight going into this one. The stock rose 10.13% to $452.00 in Wednesday's after-market session, then opened Thursday at $427.27 and closed at $411.77, giving the entire move back. The report also carried softer details: consolidated backlog fell to $2.5 billion from $2.9 billion at the start of the fiscal year, industrial gross margin came in at 7.3% which the CFO called below expectations, consolidated gross margin has stepped down three straight quarters from 25% to 21% to 19.3%, and management said a second quarter revenue pull-forward may limit sequential growth in the third.

Why did UiPath (PATH) stock fall 17% on September 4, 2026?

On the forward guidance, not the quarter. UiPath reported fiscal second quarter revenue of $410.26 million on September 3, 2026, up 13% and about $12.5 million ahead of consensus, earned $0.15 a share, logged a fourth straight quarter of GAAP profitability with $31.6 million of operating income, and raised its full-year fiscal 2027 revenue outlook to $1.789 billion to $1.794 billion. The problem was the third quarter guide of $440 million to $445 million, which implies roughly 8% growth against the 13% just delivered. Oppenheimer noted that subscription revenue missed consensus, that the beat came from professional services and licenses instead, and that the third quarter net new annual recurring revenue guide implies about a 4% decline from a year earlier. The stock fell 16.66% on 104.6 million shares against a 69.3 million average. Every analyst who moved on the print raised their price target: RBC and Canaccord to $17 from $15, TD Cowen to $16 from $13 and DA Davidson to $16 from $12, all above the $15.20 settle. Canaccord's downgrade to Hold cited the stock's rally rather than the business.

Why did semiconductor stocks rise and software stocks fall on September 4, 2026?

The August jobs report. Nonfarm payrolls rose 162,000 against a Bloomberg consensus near 55,000, the unemployment rate held at 4.1%, and July was revised to a 21,000 gain from a 23,000 fall. CME FedWatch odds of a rate increase at the September 16 meeting moved to 58% from 49% the day before. The indexes moved little, with the S&P 500 down 0.4% and the Nasdaq Composite down 0.3%, but the rotation underneath was sharp. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index gained 2.6%, led by Astera Labs up 12.03%, SanDisk 10.28%, Semtech 9.07% and KLA 8.15%, while software fell hard, with Guidewire down 21.03%, UiPath 16.66% and Autodesk 7.89%. It was the mirror image of week 5 of the AI stock battle, when every hardware name in the contest fell and the crowded AI software names held up.

What did Claude do in week 7 of the AI stock battle?

Nothing. Claude held all five positions, Rambus (RMBS), Kulicke and Soffa (KLIC), Ambarella (AMBA), UiPath (PATH) and Argan (AGX), for the second week running. Its stated reasoning was that all three of its companies that reported beat estimates, so nothing in the book broke on its own numbers; that UiPath's fall was a valuation reset rather than a business failure, since the company raised full-year guidance and every analyst price target sits above the price; that UiPath was the best performer of all 18 contest stocks in week 6 and the worst in week 7, which is what a low-correlation position is supposed to do; and that a screen of eligible replacements under $10 billion found nothing better for the third straight week. Claude had the worst week of the six models at -5.90% and is fifth at $9,271.60, with all five holdings below their entry price.

What did Meta AI buy in week 7 of the AI stock battle?

Meta AI was the only model to trade. It sold Bandwidth (BAND) at $43.44 for an 8.59% loss and put all of the proceeds into Innodata (INOD) at $55.60, a 20.2% weight. It is the third time Meta AI has owned Innodata: it bought it in week 2 at $62.84 and sold it in week 3 at $62.82 for a wash, bought it again in week 5 at $64.37 and sold it in week 6 at $56.60 for a 12.07% loss, and is now buying back about 1.8% below where it sold seven days ago. The models are shown only their current holdings each Saturday, with no record of what they previously owned, so a name sold the week before is presented to them as a new idea. The trade also removed Bandwidth from the contest entirely, since no other model held it, cutting the field from 18 distinct tickers to 17.

Which AI models are losing money in the stock battle?

Claude and Meta AI, as of the September 4, 2026 settle, the same two as the week before. Claude is at $9,271.60, down 7.28% from its $10,000 stake, and Meta AI is at $9,141.23, down 8.59%. The other four are ahead: DeepSeek at $11,343.91, Gemini at $10,876.39, Grok at $10,625.19 and ChatGPT at $10,071.79. ChatGPT is the closest to the line, up 0.72%.

Have any AI models never traded in the stock battle?

Two. Grok and DeepSeek have both gone seven weeks without completing a single trade, and they sit third and first. DeepSeek attempted its first trade in week 7 and all four of its buy orders were rejected for rule breaks, so its book remains the one it picked in week 1. Gemini has not traded since week 2. Every model that has used the weekly rebalance sits third or lower, though that is not evidence that holding wins: most of Grok's return is Aehr Test Systems alone, and DeepSeek's is concentrated in C3.ai, up 28.47% since entry.

More on PATH and AGX

David Han
David Han

David Han is the founder of AIStockWire, where he covers AI, semiconductors, and technology stocks. He focuses on finding stories the market hasn’t fully connected yet, drawing on filings, insider activity, earnings, and industry data. His commentary has been quoted by U.S. News & World Report, Moneywise, and Yahoo Finance. He invests in the companies he writes about and discloses his positions. Nothing he publishes is investment advice.