Advertisement

An Anthropic researcher quit, warning AI could be out of human control by the end of 2027

An Anthropic researcher quit, warning AI could be out of human control by the end of 2027

Key points

  • Coxon says neither Anthropic nor OpenAI is acting responsibly
  • He says systems could be out of control by end of 2027
  • He works on pretraining, not on a safety team
  • Anthropic published a similar warning this year

A researcher at Anthropic said Tuesday that he is leaving the AI industry because he fears AI systems could be out of human control by the end of 2027. Jacob Coxon told The Wall Street Journal that he doesn't want to take part in an industry-wide race to build systems that can improve themselves. Coxon works on pretraining, rather than on a dedicated safety team.

"We're on track for a lot of the most aggressive of these scenarios where by the end of next year things could be out of control already," Coxon told the Journal. He said safety trade-offs are inevitable while companies race each other and Chinese rivals, according to the report, which was written by Amrith Ramkumar and published Tuesday evening.

Coxon announced the resignation himself on X at 8:04 p.m. Eastern on Tuesday, and named OpenAI alongside his employer. "I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic," he wrote. "Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives."

Advertisement

Who Coxon is

Coxon is 27, British, and studied mathematics before moving into AI, the Journal reported. He said on X that he spent the last three years on pretraining research at the two companies. Pretraining is the stage where a model learns by consuming large volumes of data. He said many colleagues now use the words "crunchtime" and "endgame" to describe where self-improving models are heading. His Google Scholar page lists an Anthropic affiliation and credits him on OpenAI's GPT-4o system card in 2024 and on an OpenAI interpretability paper published last year.

Anthropic said something similar this year

In a post titled "When AI builds itself," Anthropic policy staff Marina Favaro and Jack Clark described a threshold they called recursive self-improvement, "an AI system capable of fully autonomously designing and developing its own successor." They wrote that "we are not there yet, and recursive self-improvement is not inevitable. But it could come sooner than most institutions are prepared for." The post argued for building the ability to coordinate and verify a slowdown or pause across frontier labs, rather than for a pause on its own. Anthropic said it would slow down if other developers at or near the frontier did so "in a verifiable manner."

His departure follows the February resignation of Mrinank Sharma, who led Anthropic's Safeguards Research team and publicly warned about AI risks in a letter posted to X, Semafor reported.

Anthropic is privately held. The company confidentially filed IPO paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission and investors have floated a $2 trillion valuation for a possible October listing, Bloomberg reported last month.

The resignation also lands in the week that Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Greg Casar introduced a bill that would ban superintelligent AI and pause advanced development until a federal regulator writes safety rules.

Advertisement

Frequently asked questions

Who is Jacob Coxon?

Jacob Coxon is a researcher at Anthropic who works on pretraining, the stage where an AI model learns by consuming large volumes of data. The Wall Street Journal reported he is 27, British, and studied mathematics before moving into AI. His Google Scholar page lists an Anthropic affiliation and credits him on OpenAI's GPT-4o system card in 2024 and on an OpenAI interpretability paper published in 2025. He says on X that he spent the last three years on pretraining research at both companies, rather than on a dedicated safety team.

Why is Jacob Coxon leaving the AI industry?

He told The Wall Street Journal on September 8, 2026 that he does not want to take part in an industry-wide race to build AI systems that can improve themselves, which he worries could spiral out of control. He said the industry is on track for the most aggressive scenarios and that things could be out of control by the end of next year. He also said safety trade-offs are inevitable while companies compete with each other and with Chinese rivals. Announcing the resignation on X, he wrote that neither Anthropic nor OpenAI is acting responsibly and that they are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.

Has Anthropic warned about self-improving AI itself?

Yes. In a post titled 'When AI builds itself,' Anthropic policy staff Marina Favaro and Jack Clark described a threshold they called recursive self-improvement, an AI system capable of fully autonomously designing and developing its own successor. They wrote that we are not there yet and that it is not inevitable, but that it could come sooner than most institutions are prepared for. The post argued for building the ability to coordinate and verify a slowdown or pause across frontier labs, saying Anthropic would slow down if other developers at or near the frontier did so in a verifiable manner.

Have other Anthropic researchers resigned over AI risk?

Coxon's departure follows the February 2026 resignation of Mrinank Sharma, who led Anthropic's Safeguards Research team and publicly warned about AI risks in a letter posted to X saying the world is in peril, according to Semafor.

More coverage

Dennis Singleton
Dennis Singleton

Dennis Singleton has spent years following the markets, but what keeps his attention is how AI is built. He writes about the companies behind the technology, from semiconductor designers and advanced packaging to photonics, memory, networking, and the hardware powering modern AI. His approach starts with filings, earnings, and industry research, then translates the important details into clear, straightforward analysis without unnecessary hype.