Meta's Claude Code users fell by half. Microsoft (MSFT) cut its planned internal Anthropic spending by over a third.

Meta and Microsoft logos with the text Using less of Anthropic's Claude

Key points

  • Meta's Claude Code users have roughly halved this year
  • Microsoft cut its projected internal Claude spending by over a third
  • Both are pushing staff toward their own AI tools

Meta (META) and Microsoft (MSFT), two major customers of Anthropic, are pushing employees toward their own AI tools as they seek to reduce internal reliance on the AI startup, The Information reported on Oct. 5.

At Meta, about 30,000 employees now use Claude Code, Anthropic's coding assistant, down from roughly 60,000 earlier this year. Microsoft had projected spending at least $1 billion on Anthropic's technology for internal use, and has since reduced that projected spending by more than a third.

Meta's own coding tools are taking over

Layoffs this spring, which cut about 10% of Meta's 78,000-person workforce, account for part of the drop. But the bigger reason is Meta's push into its own AI, according to the report.

MetaCode, a coding tool built only for Meta's employees, now has more than 30,000 users. That's about as many as still use Claude Code. Muse Code, a Claude Code rival built on Meta's own models that the company started testing outside Meta in August, has more than 6,000 internal users.

The shift has been building for months. In August, the New York Times reported that Meta's internal projections showed it could spend as much as $10 billion a year on Anthropic, even as it restricted some engineers from using Claude Code. The latest report shows fewer employees using Claude Code, though it doesn't establish how Meta's total spending on Anthropic has changed.

Microsoft's cut covers its own employees, not its customers

Microsoft's leaders asked employees to use less Claude and switch to Microsoft's own AI tools to keep costs down, the report said. In May, Microsoft started canceling Claude Code licenses for thousands of its engineers. Moving away from Claude Code doesn't necessarily mean abandoning Claude's underlying models. Microsoft's replacement tool, GitHub Copilot CLI, also supports Anthropic models.

The reduction applies to Microsoft's planned internal spending. Its customers are still increasing their spending on Anthropic models through Microsoft's enterprise platforms, according to the report.

Anthropic's customers are also its competitors

Meta and Microsoft want employees using their own tools to control costs and improve their products. That puts Anthropic in the position of selling to companies working to reduce their dependence on it.

I think the spending matters more than the user count. Meta's decline in Claude Code users doesn't tell us how much revenue Anthropic stands to lose. Microsoft's lower spending projection is a clearer sign of pressure, even as demand from its enterprise customers keeps growing.

Frequently asked questions

Are Meta and Microsoft cutting their use of Claude?

Yes, for their own employees. The Information reported on Oct. 5, 2026, that about 30,000 Meta employees now use Claude Code, down from roughly 60,000 earlier in the year, and that Microsoft cut its projected internal spending on Anthropic's technology, at least $1 billion, by more than a third.

Why is Meta using less Claude Code?

Layoffs this spring that cut about 10% of Meta's workforce contributed, but the main reason is Meta's push into its own AI tools, according to The Information. MetaCode, an internal coding tool, has more than 30,000 users, and Muse Code, built on Meta's own models, has more than 6,000 internal users.

Are Microsoft's customers buying less from Anthropic?

No. The cut covers only Microsoft's internal use. Customer spending on Anthropic's models through Microsoft's enterprise platforms is still growing steadily, according to The Information's Oct. 5, 2026, report.

More on META and MSFT

David Han
David Han

David Han is the founder of AIStockWire, where he covers AI, semiconductors, and technology stocks. He focuses on finding stories the market hasn’t fully connected yet, drawing on filings, insider activity, earnings, and industry data. His commentary has been quoted by U.S. News & World Report, Moneywise, and Yahoo Finance. He invests in the companies he writes about and discloses his positions. Nothing he publishes is investment advice.